It's the end of the world as we
know it.....
and we did it ourselves.
See you on the flip side.
Goodbye cruel world.
By Alan Boyle
Science editor
MSNBC
updated 5:03 p.m.
Will the Large Hadron Collider
destroy the world, or help the world?
As the atom-smasher at Europe's
CERN research center is readied for its official startup near Geneva on
Wednesday, researchers might wish that the general public was captivated by the
quest for the Higgs boson, the search for supersymmetric particles and even the
evidence for extra dimensions.
But if the feedback so far is any
guide, the real headline-grabber is the claim that the world's most powerful
particle-smasher could create microscopic black holes that some fear would
gobble up the plane
The black-hole scenario is even
getting its day in court: Critics of the project have called for the suspension
of work on the European collider until the scenario receives a more thorough
safety review, filing separate legal challenges in U.S. federal court and the European
Court of Human Rights.
The strange case of the
planet-eating black hole serves as just one example showing how grand
scientific projects can lead to a collision between science fiction and science
fact. The hubbub also has led some to question why billions of dollars are
being spent on a physics experiment so removed from everyday life.
Why do it?
Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist at the City College of New York, acknowledged that people often ask about the practical applications of particle physics. Even if physicists figure out how a particle called the Higgs boson creates the property of mass in the universe, how will that improve life on Earth?
Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist at the City College of New York, acknowledged that people often ask about the practical applications of particle physics. Even if physicists figure out how a particle called the Higgs boson creates the property of mass in the universe, how will that improve life on Earth?
"Sometimes the public says,
'What's in it for Numero Uno? Am I going to get better television reception? Am
I going to get better Internet reception?' Well, in some sense, yeah," he
said. "All the wonders of quantum physics were learned basically from
looking at atom-smasher technology."
FACT FILE
LHC by the numbers
Cost: $6 billion to $10 billion
Years in the making: 14
Top energy: 14 trillion electron
volts
Peak power consumption: 120
megawatts
Number of collaborators: More than
10,000
Cost: $6 billion to $10 billion
Why the wide range of estimates?
Europe’s CERN research
organization says it’s investing $6 billion. Adding the value of other
contributions since 1994, including the detectors, boosts the total to as much
as $10 billion. To some extent, it depends on who’s doing the counting and what
the currency rates are.
Sources: CERN, Symmetry magazine
• Print this
Kaku noted that past discoveries
from the world of particle physics ushered in many of the innovations we enjoy
today, ranging from satellite communications and handheld media players to
medical PET scanners (which put antimatter to practical use).
"But let me let you in on a
secret: We physicists are not driven to do this because of better color
television," he added. "That's a spin-off. We do this because we want
to understand our role and our place in the universe."
About those black holes ...
The black holes that may (or may not) be generated by the Large Hadron Collider would have theoretical rather than practical applications.
The black holes that may (or may not) be generated by the Large Hadron Collider would have theoretical rather than practical applications.
If the collider's detectors turn
up evidence of black holes, that would suggest that gravity is stronger on a
subatomic scale than it is on the distance scales scientists have been able to
measure so far. That, in turn, would support the weird idea that we live in a
10- or 11-dimensional universe, with some of the dimensions rolled up so
tightly that they can't be perceived.
Some theorists say the idea would
explain why gravity is so much weaker than the universe's other fundamental
forces — for example, why a simple magnet can match the entire Earth's
gravitational force pulling on a paper clip. These theorists suggest that much
of the gravitational field is "leaking out" into the extra
dimensions.
"It will be extremely
exciting if the LHC did produce black holes," CERN theoretical physicist
John Ellis said. "OK, so some people are going to say, 'Black holes?
Those big things eating up stars?' No. These are microscopic, tiny little black
holes. And they’re extremely unstable. They would disappear almost
as soon as they were produced."
Not everyone is convinced that the
black holes would disappear. "It doesn't have to be that way," said
Walter Wagner, a former radiation safety officer with a law degree who is one
of the plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit. Despite a series of reassuring
scientific studies, Wagner and others insist that the black holes might not
fizzle out, and they fear that the mini-singularities produced by the Large
Hadron Collider will fall to the center of the earth, grow larger and swallow
more and more of Earth's matter
2 comments:
And the atom bomb would ignite the atmosphere...
And vaccinating your child causes Autism...
And stem cell research kills babies...
And dancing causes rain...
Check Google for a good graphic today.
I, for one, am glad that there is a place for theoretical research. It's worth a black hole or two.
Art
And you call ME paranoid?????
Where's Football Girl when I need her?
Post a Comment