It seems more likely that everyday there will be reports in
the news media of another mass slaughter by some deranged gun totting folks or
some infrastructure failure or mother earth not liking some beach front or
offshore drilling. Locals will try to capture the disaster on their phones
posting videos on the social media before a professed qualified and trained
journalist can show up to get a body count.
We, as a society, seem to have a fanatic want to see the
faces of the deceased. Their profile just increases the agony and pain of those
lost too early. Even if we never heard of the person(s) we will hold vigils and
burn candles and make messages of how we grieve for strangers.
Publishing the faces seems to bring closure to the event and
allows us to move on.
We seem to be obsessed with displaying the corpse. In the
ole West, when a bandit or scalawag was killed, the town would display the
bodies like some hunter’s trophy display on the wall. Morticians and churches
feed off the deceased with carting out the body for all to view and tell
stories over. It is OK because they are not listening.
Then we put the dearly departed in a hole and it becomes a
lonely place lined up with others who had reached the end of the line.
The question is: What about the wounded?
Yes the grieving families will mourn for their lose, but
there are other families who must also adjust their lives for the disruption
and suffering and cost of the wounded. The injured yet surviving the occasion
may have a brief moment to tell the experience first hand, but will fade into
oblivion while still faced with years of pain and therapy dragging their family
and friends to new assessments of relationships.
Maybe there is not enough paper to print or fileserver space
to store all the faces. The journalists only have a deadline before the next
event takes the headlines as it has done today.
No comments:
Post a Comment