We seem to start out in packs. Groups of same-gender children played
together but never intermingling with the opposite gender. We sat in the same
classrooms but were separated by gender for games and bathrooms.
Integration presented more diversity of color and cultural heritage, but
not in the amalgamation of sexes.
Then about the time of middle school, the independent sexes started
noticing each other*. (*Note: I will be using antiquated terminology so younger
readers must bare with me. I may be referencing on historical emotional
behavior but the same is true today for all the gender variations.)
It seems we wanted to be with the other gender. Instead of groups of boys
or girls, we combined and became “couples”. This joining of two people as a couple
was a highly acceptable form of becoming mature.
Couples would go to parties together, dances together, movies together,
football games together and so on. The two became as one through an extended
dating process that went from crush to chaperoned dates to going steady to becoming
engaged and probable marriage. There is a whole ritual of sharing clothing and
jewelry and making false wishes and dreams under the pressure of the parents to
hurry the process and get you out of the house.
“So who are you seeing?” or “You going with anyone?” or “When are you
going to start having babies?” were always the questions at family gatherings.
Giving two individuals the title of ‘husband and wife’ does not guarantee
a romance or a guarantee they will be suitable a couple. The foundation of a
relationship, whether romantic, sexual, emotional, financial or just out of
convenience can change through the years and the two must decide to adjust and
continue or try someone else.
Yet society expects, even anticipates everyone must be in a couple.
There is nothing better than sharing that special moment with someone
else. That last glimpse of sunset after a long day at the beach, holding hands
for a long walk in the forest, waking together on a chilly winter morning,
laughing or crying at an emotional scene can bond two people, but the feeling
is really just your own.
You have no complete conception of what the other individual is really
relating the experience to. It may have been a reference before the two of you
met or maybe some personal inter-psychological reaction and you are only
reacting to their reaction.
Depending on another to give emotional strength or support only goes so
far. The other person in the couple can’t help you with your employment
conflicts or anxiety over some frivolous matter that only applies to you. Even
the flat tire on the out-of-state highway has to be solved by you and you
alone, no matter how many phone calls you make complaining about the situation.
You have to brush your own teeth, put on your own socks, clean yourself
and a vast majority of your day will be spent alone.
Being alone is an acceptance of independence. One person can make
self-determination or autonomy alone.
Taking out the trash is a self-assigned chore not reminded by another,
making up the bed is a self-choice decision, carrying a heavy piece of lumber
without assistance gives realization of the faith of accomplishment or the
possibility of possible physical disaster and pain or the loneliness of no one
to tell your strange dreams to.
With you alone are about waking up and not having to get up. A sort of
vacation without another to deal with except you. At the same time, no one else
is there to tend your wounds or call for help for you are all alone.
It is a personal decision like driving or procreating or wearing last
year’s fashion. To be self-reliant could be a spiritual awakening not requiring
a religion.
Enjoy the moon tonight. We will.
No comments:
Post a Comment