Not to shatter all your Kumbaya
feelings, but I read this word in the ‘fake’ Washington Post news and it gave me a shutter. With all our
devisees it seems that some of our elected officials (those we chose to
represent our ideals) are trying to resurge the idea of separate-but-equal.
“LAST
YEAR, Rep. Paul A. Gosar, an Arizona Republican, explained why he disliked an
Obama administration plan to build affordable housing — as a means of helping
minorities and poor people — in mainly white, middle-class neighborhoods.
“Instead
of living with neighbors you like and choose, this breaks up the core fabric of
how we start to look at communities,” Mr. Gosar told the Hill newspaper. “That
just brings unease to everyone in that area.”
Yes:
“Unease” at the prospect of neighborhood integration has long been central to
U.S. racism, or a euphemism for it. It has also played a central role in an
equally poisonous problem — the resegregation of public schools — that started
accelerating 15 years ago, about a half-century after the Supreme Court ruled
that segregated schools are “inherently unequal.” Washington Post
From what I remember separate
was never equal.
There has to be a reason for
separation idea?
“On Sept. 23, 1957,
thousands of segregationists blocked nine young black students from enrolling
in Little Rock Central High School, an all-white institution in the Arkansas
capital. Gov. Orval Faubus ignited a nationwide crisis when he defied the
Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 decision on desegregation, Brown v. Board of
Education, and deployed the Arkansas National Guard to bar the students. Two
days later, President Dwight D. Eisenhower ordered U.S. Army units to escort
the Little Rock Nine into the school.
This fall marked the
60th anniversary of this pivotal moment in the history of America’s racial
struggle. With the political landscape seemingly as divided as it has ever
been, this moment provides an opportunity to examine the depth and contours of
segregation in the nation today. Though clear advances have been made since the
civil rights movement, the enactment of increasingly conservative social
policies over the last half-century reveals how tenuous such progress turned
out to be.
The consequences of
creeping racial resegregation should constitute nothing less than a national
crisis.
U.S. cities have
grown more segregated over the past 40 years, and persistent and intensifying
racial disparities between white communities and people of color have emerged.
This systematic re-segregation has grave implications for access to health care
services, education and accumulation of wealth.” Washington Post
I grew up in
segregation. Just as two generations earlier people were forced into servitude
as if the Middle Ages reigned over the colonies. It was the status quo born
into.
Being of the ‘majority’
(aka ‘White’) population I could accept the privilege without knowing the
consequences of my life compared to those across the street. Having an umbrella
as opposed to running for shelter in the rain had little effect on me until I
started to realize why everybody didn’t have an umbrella.
When
‘integration’ started at my school, it seemed no big deal because like any
migration, ‘they’ kept to themselves and didn’t intermingle out of distrust or
fear. If there had been aggression, bigotry, prejudice, I never saw it but for
those who hide in the shadows?
So here is a
politician suggesting the country move back to the times of separate-but…?
Now let’s
think about it. Going back to a time of one race feeling superior to another
due to whatever misguided factions could be brushed off as if we’d moved on,
but have we?
On the other
side, should we just throw away all our restrictions and regulations, as it
seems to be re-evolving? Should we just drill anywhere because we done need
that oil and should we just shoot any animal including our children and should
we restrict people who are different to poverty and misery?
If we decide
or are told to go back to basics, will we survive?
The basics
are that we must have sex. We can go without food or shelter to have sex. We
dream about it, we talk about it, we look at it, we desire (no crave) it, and
other than taking a break for a sandwich and a poop, we feel we could just have
sex all day and all night.
Unfortunately
all that would do is make lots of babies, so we take a break to make money
because we are too tired to hunt and gather. Then we start playing the
hanky-panky game and sex turns to violence. Jealousy is such a funky emotion.
But on that
take, we also enjoy killing. We make better weapons to wage war on each other
with the excuse that we kill whatever animal we please to extinguish for the
food on the table or the head on the wall. After the animal slaughter bores us,
we move onto finding new ways to torture each other.
After all
that, we, the people of this planet called ‘Earth’, need a reason for the
unknown. Seems most of us want to believe in some omnipresent alien being causing
all our problems.
So now we are
getting back to the root of civilization where we are walking around killing
each other and eating animals and having lots of sex.
Oh, I forgot
a big one. We also want to be loopy. Whether it be drink or a puff or a snort
or a shot or a pill, we want to feel no pain. Actually we want to feel goofy.
Look at the excess today to prove if we had no restrictions, Katy bar the door.
While we are
going back to the good-ole-days, lets take off those other restrictions like
speed limits and building inspections and food testing and haircuts.
A little
overdone for the ‘re-segregation’ theory, but now we are stumbling around naked
with a weapon in one hand and our main squeeze (for the time being) in the
other looking for the latest craft brewery or ultimate fight.
It wouldn’t
take long for us to slide down the slippery slope of civilization to our worst intrinsic
nature.
Every day we indulge
in the propaganda while it chips away at our achievements.
No comments:
Post a Comment